This week in our editing class, we're talking about headline writing. The few times I've tried to write a good one. I've failed miserably and I've concluded that it takes a lot of talent to write a headline that both encompasses the entire article and is catchy.
I started thinking about misleading headlines when I came across this one from the Globe and Mail this morning.
"Girl who had hiccups for five weeks charged with murder"
My initial thought, before reading the article, was what I hoped to believe. Having the hiccups for five weeks drove her to murder?
But when I read the article, I found out that a woman who was famous in 2007 for having the hiccups for five weeks when she was 15 years old (she appeared on The Today Show and got a hug from Keith Urban).
Now 19, she has been charged with first-degree murder, the climax of a downhill slide which her mother claims started with the "curse of the hiccups". The girl ran away from home twice and the family sued a hiccup-curing company for using the girl's image without permission.
But really, I got to thinking, without the mother's somewhat ridiculous claim, what is the link between the hiccups and the murder? Without her hiccup fame, we likely wouldn't be hearing about a Florida murder in a Canadian paper.
But I know for sure, without that headline, I likely wouldn't have read the article. So despite the confusion, maybe the headline writer did his/her job?
(Images from blogcrack.com)
Me and Chase's favorite one:
ReplyDelete"Teen dribbles around load of misfortune"
The secret is all in the verb. Boring verbs suck in headlines - ad and J alike.
ReplyDelete